Am 14.11.2012 10:18, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 11/14/2012 1:01 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I still don't agree with you there. The struct would have clearly
outlived any
thread (as it was in the global scope) so at the point where it is
destroyed
there should be really only one thread left. So it IS destroyed in a
single
threaded context.
If you know this for a fact, then cast it to thread local. The compiler
cannot figure this out for you, hence it issues the error.
The same is done for classes by the GC just that the GC
ignores shared altogether.
That's different, because the GC verifies that there are *no* references
to it from any thread first.
Could you please give an example where it would break?
And whats the difference between:
struct Value
{
~this()
{
printf("destroy\n");
}
}
shared Value v;
and:
shared static ~this()
{
printf("destory\n");
}
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
