On 2012-11-14 22:06, Walter Bright wrote:
I hate to repeat myself, but:Thread 1: 1. create shared object 2. pass reference to that object to Thread 2 3. destroy object Thread 2: 1. manipulate that object
Why would the object be destroyed if there's still a reference to it? If the object is manually destroyed I don't see what threads have to do with it since you can do the same thing in a single thread application.
-- /Jacob Carlborg