On 11/19/12 12:30 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2012-11-19 06:52:11 +0000, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> said:
On 11/19/12 1:02 AM, Rob T wrote:
So what's up with @property?
It's a mistake on top of another. We need to redesign it to such that
the keyword '@property' is only required in cases that otherwise would
be ambiguous (functions returning functions).
…or functions returning a type with an opCall.
What about template functions with a parametrized return type that will
sometime be ambiguous and sometime not depending on the template
parameters?
Let's put all of these cases in a DIP so we can analyze them.
Thanks,
Andrei
