On 12/3/2012 6:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting the revamp in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let std.xml wither and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because the correct name was already taken by something broken.
So call it xmlex like Microsoft does. The exact name isn't that precious.
