On Monday, 3 December 2012 at 08:37:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/3/2012 6:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:
For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting
the revamp
in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let
std.xml wither
and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.
Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because
the
correct name was already taken by something broken.
So call it xmlex like Microsoft does. The exact name isn't that
precious.
It is.
