On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 21:13:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/11/12 3:54 PM, Rob T wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:33:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of
30 seconds
to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin
freezing my
entire browser.
ddox* on dlang.org, anyone?
http://vibed.org/temp/phobos/index.html
* https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox
Man, how did I miss that? I like that.
http://vibed.org/temp/phobos/std/datetime.html
Wow, that's a HUGE improvement to what has been a very
difficult read
for std.datetime.
I'd like to bookmark the Vibe Phobos reference page for use as
my
library reference. Will it remain there at least until the
official web
page reference is improved in a similar or identical way?
Do whom do we talk about Borging the vibe dox into dlang.org?
Andrei
Soenke Ludwig, or ask here
http://news.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/
IMO dlang should be powered by vibe.d
