On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 23:04:56 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 20:08:32 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/9/12 10:58 PM, Nick B wrote:
[about the Disruptor framework]
Would Andrei like to comment on any of the comments so far ??
Sorry, I'd need to acquire expertise in Disruptor before
discussing it. I found
http://disruptor.googlecode.com/files/Disruptor-1.0.pdf quite
difficult to get into because it spends the first page stating
how good Disruptor is, then the next 3 pages discussing
unrelated generalities, to then start discussing
implementation details still without really defining the
pattern. I had to stop there.
Is there a more concise description of the pattern?
Andrei
I have looked, but I think the answer is to this question is no.
Nick
Correction. The answer to this question is actually YES.
Read the martinfowler article. See the link below.
see Dmitry comments below, as well as I'd consider
[Dmitry comments] http://martinfowler.com/articles/lmax.html to
be quite nice
description as it helped me to decipher the most of details.
The paper itself lacks illustrative material, focuses too much on
overcoming Java limitations and generally too terse with
important (to
me) details of the framework.
Totally agree.
Nick
