On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 08:09:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
12/12/2012 6:00 AM, Nick B пишет:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 23:04:56 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 20:08:32 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/9/12 10:58 PM, Nick B wrote:
[about the Disruptor framework]
Would Andrei like to comment on any of the comments so far
??
Sorry, I'd need to acquire expertise in Disruptor before
discussing
it. I found
http://disruptor.googlecode.com/files/Disruptor-1.0.pdf
quite difficult to get into because it spends the first page
stating
how good Disruptor is, then the next 3 pages discussing
unrelated
generalities, to then start discussing implementation
details still
without really defining the pattern. I had to stop there.
Is there a more concise description of the pattern?
Ok, does anyone consider that this pattern, though not well
described,
has any value ?
Nick
It surely has.
I'd consider http://martinfowler.com/articles/lmax.html to be
quite nice description as it helped me to decipher the most of
details.
The paper itself lacks illustrative material, focuses too much
on overcoming Java limitations and generally too terse with
important (to me) details of the framework.
[Request again] Would Andre like to make any comment, especially
on the martin fowler article ? Others commenting here have said
that they consider that the pattern has some value ?
Nick
