On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 23:21:15 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 19:59:31 UTC, Isaac Gouy wrote:
On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 15:45:32 UTC, jerro wrote:
if, say, GDC was granted to come back in the shootout. Given
it's now widely acknowledged (at least in the programming
communities) to be one of the most promising languages
around...
And especially if you also consider the fact that there Clean
and ATS are in the shootout and I'm guessing that very few
people use those.
See
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Why_did_D_leave_the_programming_language_shootout_and_will_it_return_144864.html#N144870
Still, you don't explain why you picked, say ATS, which is
significantly more esoteric than D, and much less likely to be
used by the community in the large. I argue that many more
people would be interested in the performance of D.
Proof is, it seems to me that you (Isaac Gouy) often come around
here. We can magically invoke you every time one talks about the
shootout. Which is pretty astonishing for a language you aren't
interested in.
