Walter Bright wrote: > On 12/22/2012 12:46 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >> Pretty much every time that this issue comes up, people are surprised >> by the >> fact that private symbols aren't hidden and pretty much no one wants >> them to >> be in overload sets. > > This has been discussed before, and the same people wanted private > functions removed from overload sets in classes. > > So why does this never come up in C++ if it's such a problem? Like I > said, I've never seen this come up on peoples' lists of what they don't > like about C++, and it isn't because they're shy about complaining about > C++ :-)
Because C++ *can* hide symbols from other modules with the
anonymous namespace. D has no equivalent.
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
