On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 15:43:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tim Krimm:Why make it a requirement or give a warning.If it's not enforced I think it becomes a not useful enough feature.
Let's cut it at half: if "inout" &co. are specified, then non-concordance with function declaration will be a requirement.
If "inout" & co. are not specified, then they are simply not required. Code breakage will be avoided.
