On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 22:27:02 UTC, Robert wrote:
@property int a;
would be completely equivalent to: <snip>
Not bad.
Another thing I am wondering, will this still be possible:
void myProperty(int a) @property {}
void function(int) dg=&myProperty;
If I get things my way, no. I'd rewrite that, internally, into
&(myProperty()), and then, (unless it returns ref), you'd get an
error about can't take address of an rvalue.
There'd be no way, under my preference, to treat a property like
a function at all.
I think it would be quite sensible and useful
Indeed, but there's an easy alternative too that works with both
kinds of data, properties and regular: wrapping it in an function
at the usage site, e.g. "(a) => myProp = a;"
