On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:47:44 -0800, Robert <jfanati...@gmx.at> wrote:
Proper property design:
@property int a;
gets actually lowered by the compiler to:
int a_;
@property int a() {
return a_;
}
@property int a(int new_a) {
a_=new_a;
return a_;
}
-> field property, and get/set property are actually the same thing. ->
It is guaranteed that they behave the same way and can always be
exchanged.
-> Taking the address of the getter/setter also always works, enabling
things like connecting the setter to a signal for example.
I don't know about you guys, but I love this. It is just perfect. What
do I miss?
Best regards,
Robert
The syntax provides no way to define read-only or write-only properties.
Other than that I love it, but I am a biased C# guy.
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
