On Friday, January 25, 2013 09:54:02 eles wrote: > Tooo bad, I feel like the best word for that, namely "@property" > was wasted.
I dispute that we can't just use @property since it was its design from the get-go that it would require that there be no parens (it's even discussed in TDPL). It's just that it hasn't been properly enforced. Making it so that it's enforced would be like when we fixed it so that the compiler enforced that final switch statements had cases for all of an enum's values. Code which followed the spec was unaffected, and for any code that _was_ affected, the new enforcement was catching a bug. - Jonathan M Davis
