"BCS" <n...@anon.com> wrote in message news:a6268ff5f598cba54ecba23...@news.digitalmars.com... > > void fn(char[] str, S s) > { > with(s) > { > sscanf(str.ptr, "<%i, %i, %i>", &x, &z, &y); // I'm not adding > this to S > } > } >
You don't really see that as an improvement over this do you?:
void fn(char[] str, S s)
{
sscanf(str.ptr, "<%i, %i, %i>", &s.x, &s.z, &s.y);
}
If anything, the "with" version looks worse to me, and those three "s." are
trivial.
