Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Look at this for example:
> writefln("%s", is(typeof(rtzx) == char));
This compiles even if rtzx doesn't exist. But you probably wanted to
check the type of rtzx, not it if rtzx exists. If you mistyped rtzx,
the compiler will never tell you.
You can do 'is(typeof(rtzx)) && is(typeof(rtzx) == char)', or wrap it in
a template.
The first is() in your expression is completely redundant, though. Not
sure what you mean.
Anyway, my point was not about what's possible, but that it leads to not
very robust code. Besides, you can't even tell what exactly went wrong
inside the is(), because the compiler (of course) doesn't emit any error
messages if that code isn't compileable.
