"Don" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:gurkuo$17n...@digitalmars.com... > Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "Don" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message >> news:gur1ec$18...@digitalmars.com... >>> If warnings exist, libraries must not do anything that creates a >>> warning. They are NOT optional. >> >> That's only true if a compiler (such as DMD) is only capable of treating >> warnings as errors. > > No. Users complain if library code generates warnings. Because a user > cannot make their code warning-free if the libraries they use are > generating warnings.
They can if they use a prebuilt version of the library, a lib/a/dll.