On Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 20:04:44 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-02-14 13:20, Regan Heath wrote:
Just a minor point from me. I reckon the functionality you
want can and
should be built on top of std.getopt.
The thing is that most of this is already present and working
in the argument parser in Tango. The rest I've added myself. I
don't feel too enthusiastic about redoing half of the work
that's already been done in Tango.
May I be of help? I'd gladly spent some efforts on improving
std.getopt given some official design direction.
