On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 19:06:55 UTC, Robert wrote:
Hi guys!
Based on the feedback I got in discussions on this newsgroup I
reworked
DIP26.
The new version
- emphasizes less on encapsulation as people seem to have a
problem
with phrases I used. (And I really got carried away a bit on
this
one)
- Clarified the section about UFCS as people seem to think
that I am
crazy and trying to destroy the range interface for arrays.
- In general I tried to make things a bit more clear,
especially what
it is all about.
Thanks for the feedback!
Best regards,
It still introduce limitation for very poor reasons. You assumed
people didn't understood you DIP but in fact, people did.