Re: DIP26 reworked

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 12:55:46 UTC, Robert wrote:

Although this critique does not really apply to DIP26, but rather DIP23 (they still need to be resolved as DIP26 builds on the concept of optional parentheses of DIP23) but I would like to know what is bad

about the things DIP26 introduces and most importantly why.

Thanks again for constructive feedback.

Yes, I oppose the same critic to DIP23.