On 2013-02-17 15:40, Dicebot wrote:
Don't really have a vision how it will look like in practice based on released data, but looking at current discussion I'd like to state that I am most interested in a centralized library/app list, dependency tracker and an easy way to get sources. Support for a popular build systems may be fine as a bonus, but only as an added feature, with no coupling. I'd hate to see a ruby gem (or similar) hell pushed as a "D way". Packaging is best done (and should be) by OS package manager, not hundreds of languages-specific managers. Good language package manager in my opinion is just an information source for OS package builders.
There are no package managers out of the box for Mac OS X or Windows. -- /Jacob Carlborg
