On 2013-02-28 00:37:50 +0000, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> said:
Hello,
Walter and I have had a long conversation about the next radical thing
to do to improve D's standing. Like others in this community, we
believe it's a good time to consider bootstrapping the compiler. Having
the D compiler written in D has quite a few advantages, among which
taking advantages of D's features and having a large codebase that
would be its own test harness.
By this we'd like to initiate a dialog about how this large project can
be initiated and driven through completion. Our initial basic ideas are:
1. Implement the dtoh standalone program that takes a D module and
generates its corresponding C++ header.
2. Use dtoh to initiate and conduct an incremental port of the
compiler. At given points throughout the code D code will coexist and
link with C++ code.
3. At a point in the future the last C++ module will be replaced with a
D module. Going forward there will be no more need for a C++ compiler
to build the compiler (except as a bootstrapping test).
It is essential that we get support from the larger community for this.
This is a large project that should enjoy strong leadership apart from
Walter himself (as he is busy with dynamic library support which is
strategic) and robust participation from many of us.
Please chime in with ideas on how to make this happen.
Actually, I think it'd be easier and faster to convert it all in one
chunk. Perhaps I'm a little too optimistic, but I did port successfully
a game from D to C++ once and it was not that difficult. I never
bothered with having a half-translated version that'd work.
My impression is that trying to add some layer to make the intermediary
state compile is more likely to introduce bugs than to help. The
current architecture isn't modular enough to do that without many
complications.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.ca
http://michelf.ca/
