On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:16:22 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
I fear there's a misunderstanding somewhere. Splitter and find are
already specialized appropriately for strings.
OK, I would then counter that I have created a splitter range that beats
its performance, by a lot. As far as I can tell, I'm not doing anything
special.
All I feel that I'm doing differently is instead of using find or indexOf,
I'm looking at each char to see if it matches the first in the separator,
and if it does, then I'm comparing the remaining characters. Pretty
braindead, probably room for improvement.
Splitter should beat this, or match it at least. From testing the sample
code in this thread, my simple version beats splitter by 40%. Something
isn't right somewhere, the difference should not be that drastic.
-Steve
