09-Mar-2013 05:19, Brad Anderson пишет:
On Saturday, 9 March 2013 at 00:48:59 UTC, DypthroposTheImposter wrote:
See the static_if paper here:
http://isocpp.org/forums
Under the post "constraints and static if" there is a link to a
document about
static_if
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=forums&srcid=MDIyMDc3NjUwMTczOTM0Mjk3NjABMDI2MzM3MjkxNDM4NDQ5MzE4NDcBLWVsS1Y4dFhtdDhKATUBaXNvY3BwLm9yZwF2Mg
Are they full of it? Has it caused the problems they mention
in
D?
Well, the two guys with an alternative proposal (concepts-lite) seem to
hate static if (along with a third guy).
In fact I'd *love* for C++ to take the concepts-lite path.
Why?
Because then we can see how it works out for them and probably steal
some ideas, of course, porting the to D's static if workhorse. C++14 is
just around the corner if they are actually able to ship standards that
fast (as they plan).
And even if concepts is a failure... well, it's C++ - I couldn't care
less :)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
