On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:25:52 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I also think writing DIP would be better. ...
Btw, Kenji, what do you think about redefining "in" to "const scope ref" and allowing compiler to chose how variable exactly is passed ("auto ref" with no template bloat)? Within those restrictions plain values should be indistinguishable from const rvalue refs.
Will make "in" also much more meaningful as a separate entity.
