After some thinking on topic I come to conclusion that rvalue
refs _should_ be "scope ref" and stuff like "ref int f(@temp ref
int x) { return x; }" is invalid. I can see no valid use case for
such an error-prone case. Contrary, "scope ref" feels just like
it was designed for this task, also a good moment to actually
define what "scope" means.
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Zach the Mystic
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references kenji hara
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Dicebot
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references Namespace
- Re: My thoughts & tries with rvalue references kenji hara