On Saturday, 30 March 2013 at 18:05:27 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
{c, $_} = tup;
{c, @} = tup;
{c, @_} = tup;
{c, $$} = tup;
{c, {}} = tup;
{c, {_}} = tup;
{c, $~} = tup;
{c, @~= tup;
etc.
{c, ?} = tup;
Right, I was forgetting that.
Or this if you want to keep the single "?" for hypothetical
future nullable types:
{c, ?_} = tup;
What about
----
{c, void} = tup;
----
(proposed by Hara Kenji in the original AutoTupleDeclaration
declaration pull request
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/341 )
(and, independently of the missing symbol choice)
----
{a,b,void...} = tup; //tup = {1,2,3,4,5};
----
