On 4/6/13 4:10 AM, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
Not disagreeing, but you had mentioned nullable types before, and I
was wondering what they might look like also. Have you made an
enhancement for these I could examine?
I opened this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4571
Part of the syntax is:
T? means T nullable
T@ = means not nullable.
But that ER is a confused mess, and in the meantime the @disable was
introduced. Now the probability of such nullable syntax+semantics to be
introduced in D is very low, so probably I will close down that ER.
Bye,
bearophile
I think it's safe to close it. Nullable types have not enjoyed a lot of
appreciation in C#.
Andrei
