On 10 April 2013 19:22, Dicebot <m.stras...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 09:15:26 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> Well there's always the standing question though, why is JVM and C# so >> much >> faster than D? >> They produce a squillion times more garbage than D, yet they're much much >> faster. I have come to accept the C# GC in less-intensive realtime >> software, it's not so bad. >> > > Erm, because they are not faster? I have performance tested vibe.d > recently vs some similar solutions, including Java and C#. Vibe.d compiled > with dmd. Destroyed both JVM and C# in raw performance and had same roughly > latency (GC collections cycles, gah!). > > And Erlang won all of them in terms of latency on powerful machine. >
How much garbage were you collecting? How long were the collect times? Did you see the same relationship between the volume of garbage in JVM, C# and D? What was the performance relationship with respect to garbage volume? was it linear?
