On 4/10/13 4:35 PM, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 04/10/2013 01:14 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Well yea, Quantic Dream goes WAAAAAY off into the "interactive movie"
realm.
Because that's what the game is. There's nothing wrong with it if you
like it, and many people do.
Keep in mind, I'm using "interactive movie" largely for lack of a
better term. "Videogame" definitely isn't the right word for them.
They're games, and they use the video medium. Video games. The rest of
your post is mostly just a rant about what you personally like in video
games/"interactive movies". You are of course entitled to an opinion,
but the grumpy old man ranting gets old.
FWIW there's this Neal Stephenson novel "Diamond Age" taking place in
the future. That book's vision is that all modern movies are "ractive"
(short from "interactive") using networked real players and a loose
script, whereas old movies are "passive"s and only watched by a few
older people.
Andrei
