On 11 April 2013 10:53, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 5:06 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > >> I don't know. The thread safe example probably works better with an >> annotated >> type than nogc. >> > > @nogc would have to be enforced by the compiler. Furthermore, it's viral > in that much of the runtime library would have to be gone through and > marked @nogc, otherwise it would be fairly useless. > > It's a fairly intrusive change. > As a key user, I can't say I'd even want to use this. I'd rather just see time put into improving the GC, making it more practical/flexible ;)
