2013/4/18 Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com>
> On 4/16/2013 8:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> There's a discussion that may be of interest to the larger community:
>> https://github.com/D-**Programming-Language/dmd/pull/**1877<https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1877>
>>
>
> What do you think of this:
>
> typeof(return) foo(int x) { return x; }
>
> ? That would only infer the return type, not the attributes.
>
It will break existing code.
int foo() {
typeof(return) bar() { return 1; }
return bar();
}
typeof(return) represents the return type of foo, that is int.
Kenji Hara
