How about "on hold"? (Not that I have any say in it at all)
As long as it is implemented in the near future and we must not
wait another year (not even a half) it is ok.
But the fact is, that we don't know what state it has, because we
get no response.
The fact is, there's much more to any change than simply
implementing it. Changes break unexpected things. There are
always extra corner cases not considered. There are always bugs
and inconsistencies.
Could be, but I don't see what could be broken by this DIP. All
contingencies are listed also in the DIP (and that are not many).
And it passed all tests what is crucial.
Although it's great that you and some others have done the
legwork to implement this proposal, it may have to wait until
other more urgent problems have been fixed.
Could be, but I don't know why. Which other fix is necessary for
this pull?
But also this would be ok, as long as we know, _which_ problems
must be fixed.
