On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 16:08:55 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
The only thing I could think of was if you want to 'ref' a
reference type.
void func(ref Object o, scope Object o2, scope ref Object o3) {}
Would there be a difference between the type of o and o2, or of
o2 and o3? There is inconsistency, but it would be nice to find
use cases which make this inconsistency truly unworkable with
other things in the language.
Taking consistent approach with "ref", they all should have same
type but bpth "ref" and "scope" differences are mangled into func
name so that caller can take notion of proper behavior. I don't
see an issue here.
