On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 04:58:30 UTC, anonymous wrote:
For fast bitwise comparison there's the "is" operator.
The "==" operator should be "slow".
See also http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3789
Well okay. The docs will have to be updated for this issue if
it's "fixed".
For instance:
http://dlang.org/ctod.html#structcmp
In any case, I stand by that if you have a particular definition
of behavior, you should provide it instead of expecting it to
"just work." But I suppose using "is" is more appropriate for
this type of behavior. But calling it "broken" is a bit too
strong.
