On 4/25/2013 11:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:
This "feature" never has been useful to me.
It has been useful to me. So there!
It has caused bug.
The bug is not providing an overload for int.
Additionally, the behavior is inconsistent : int i = 1; foo(i); // Don't call the bool version.
It is not inconsistent - you forgot a foo(int) overload. '1' is an int. If you don't supply and int overload, it must implicitly convert, and those conversions are considered equivalent.
