On 04/29/2013 12:51 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Sunday, 28 April 2013 at 22:25:43 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/28/2013 11:51 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Sunday, 28 April 2013 at 21:29:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/28/2013 10:54 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
Isn't that self-contradictory?
He is saying bool is an integral type in D. (i.e. it can be promoted
to 'int' in order to support integer arithmetic.)
I thought we just established that boolean logic isn't integer logic?
Please make sure your statements make sense.
Huh?
Walter says bool is an integer,
Certainly not. bool is a type. 2 is an integer.
He says that bool is an integral type (which has a very specific
meaning, lined out above.)
but he understands that boolean variables don't follow integer logic.
That makes no sense, it's like saying "I understand the sky is blue, but
the sky is red."
Check his statements again, I guess.
What part of this is not making sense to you?
Eg. "integer logic".
