On Tuesday, 21 May 2013 at 17:31:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/21/13 1:27 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Then we can correctly judge whether the name change is worth
doing. I
don't know that it is. std.uni is not immediately recognizable
as
something else, so it warrants a lookup in the docs. Yes, less
obvious,
but not horrifically misnamed. I don't think it's worth the
effort to
rename at this point unless it's shown that nearly nobody uses
it.
I agree. I'd personally love it if std.unicode replaced
std.uni, but at this point the rename is insufficiently
motivated. It's not like people go, "hmmm I need some Unicode
stuff, let me see if std.unicode is there. No? The hell with
it, I'm moving to another language."
Andrei
It isn't really a rename as a new module is being integrated. We
can keep what we have under std.uni for a while. If you want the
new hotness, go for std.unicode .
