Am Tue, 21 May 2013 20:34:02 +0200 schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com>:
> On 2013-05-21 19:53, Idan Arye wrote: > > > The problem is that people that need Unicode stuff see `std.utf` and > > assume that all Unicode related stuff are there. > > I never can remember if I should look in std.utf or std.uni. That > wouldn't change if it was renamed to std.unicode. ...and looking at the content I really wonder what the distinction is. I wouldn't say that "Unicode" is much more than "Utf". All in all it is another way (or several ways) to assign numbers to characters. Before this long discussion I thought "std.encoding.unicode", "std.encoding.ascii", etc. makes sense and I still think so. It also makes it more likely that authors of such modules try to keep a common layout or set of functions for everything in std.encoding. Just my 2ยข ;) -- Marco