Derek Parnell wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 03:52:44 +1200, Tim Matthews wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
It's unreliable because how do you specify the load order? And how does
the user relate that to the source semantics?
grauzone suggested this earlier:
static this {} //full dependencies (all import statements)
static this : a, b {} //only dependent from module a and b
static this : void {} //no dependencies at all
Is there a situation in which the dependancies are not known by the coder
writer? For example, linking in some object code that has a "static this{}"
section and not having the source code for that object code.
file A.di:
void foo();
file B.d:
static this () { foo(); }
All bets are off. A more sophisticated object format can correct this.
