It's also possible (although, in my opinion, less preferable) to keep the spec written in DDoc macros but reformatted to allow for easier conversion to other formats...
I hasten to add that I don't mean to criticise the original
writers of the DLang Spec for writing it in DDoc macros. So far,
I've found the documentation fairly easy to follow (as plain
text) and so I don't want to lose any of that should the spec be
rewritten.
- DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (... Walter Bright
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Borden
- Re: DLang Spec rewrite (?) Walter Bright