Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:21:33 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu > <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: > >> To argue that convincingly, you'd need to disable conversions from >> arrays of class objects to void[]. > > You're right. Perhaps implicit cast of reference types to void[] should > result in an error.
If only there were a way to indicate that void[]s could contain pointers, then they would behave uniformly across types... Oh wait.
