On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:16:48 +0200 Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote: > > No, it does not! [...] >
Yea, see my other recent responses. For some reason I was (incorrectly) thinking of closures being captured and stored at the end of the current function call instead of (correctly) at the end of the current lexical scope.
