On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:38:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/11/13 1:01 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
As in a module destructor? Isn't it better to let the error
pass
silently rather than throwing an exception that can't be
caught?
It will not be caught but will cause the entire program to
print a diagnostic and exit with a nonzero error code, which is
useful.
Then we should also provide a hook so the user has the option of
handling it. For example, core.exception could provide
void setStaticDestructorExceptionHandler(
void function(string module, Throwable t) handler);
or similar.
