On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:53:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 01:45:24AM +0200, Mehrdad wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 22:28:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>Really? I thought there are conservative GC's out there for
>C++
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/xjvlpegvhcwioqrjh...@forum.dlang.org?page=5#post-mwnwtdnbglcwoneqqoao:40forum.dlang.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boehm_garbage_collector
The GC doesn't need to be part of the language (though it's
nice if it
is).
T
And technically since C++11 a GC is part of the language, since
there is now an official GC API on the runtime, even though it is
optional to provide a real GC in current standard.
