On 07/10/2013 07:47 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
There are severel comments in the part of the dmd front end that show
the syntax that the parser is looking for. Here's a listing:
// function type (parameters) { statements... }
// delegate type (parameters) { statements... }
// function (parameters) { statements... }
// delegate (parameters) { statements... }
// function { statements... }
// delegate { statements... }
// (parameters) { statements... }
// { statements... }
// identifier => expression
Based on the fact that "function (parameters) => expression" isn't
written out like the others,
You mean, like some others.
I'm going to file an [...] bug for this.
// (parameters) => expression ?
In any case, please consider that it actually makes no sense to restrict
the expressiveness of the type signature based on how the function body
is specified. (Why on earth should one have to use the { return
expression; } syntax just in order to be able to assert that no context
pointer is required?)
The documentation is in error here.
