2013/8/20 H. S. Teoh <hst...@quickfur.ath.cx> > Actually, reading through DIP32 again, it sounds like Kenji is proposing > the *same* syntax for both built-in tuples and std.typecons.Tuple. In > the code example under "Generic type/expression tuple syntax", he refers > to them respectively as "tuple type" and "tuple value". Mixing is also > allowed (e.g., in the "alias Fields" line). >
Honestly, I had intended DIP32 to provide *uniform* syntax for both built-in tuple and std.typecons.Tuple. However, finally, I noticed that would be _impossible_. I'll withdraw DIP32 and will open new DIP for only built-in tuple syntax proposal. Kenji Hara
