On 8/20/13 5:28 PM, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
OT: is the only thing stopping us from using the nice (x,y) syntax for
tuples the comma operator? If so, can we take that mis-feature behind
the woodshed and shoot it? I sincerely hope nobody is relying on it...
I think this whole thread is approaching things wrongly. It should be:
1. What do we need?
2. What does a solution look like in the current language?
3. Which parts of the solution are frequent/cumbersome enough to warrant
a language change?
Instead there have been 1001 proposals for new syntax for tuple
literals, one cuter than the next.
Andrei
