Re: std.logger

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-08-22 18:02, Robert Schadek wrote:

You are properly right, but ultimately I would like to write log(),
warning(), ... but that did
not fly last time. log!Warning() would also be fine but that leads to
other problems.
Anyway, changing to lower, logLog or something else isn't really a
problem IMO when
a consensus has been found.

With my suggestion you can use the with-statement as well if you are 
performing a lot of logging:

with (log)
{
    error("bar");
    info("foo");
}

--
/Jacob Carlborg