On 08/22/2013 06:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2013-08-22 18:02, Robert Schadek wrote: > > With my suggestion you can use the with-statement as well if you are > performing a lot of logging: > > with (log) > { > error("bar"); > info("foo"); > } > yes, I believe you're right, but I have not coded/tested it yet
- Re: std.logger Johannes Pfau
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger Craig Dillabaugh
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger Craig Dillabaugh
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger Craig Dillabaugh
- Re: std.logger Craig Dillabaugh
- Re: std.logger Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger David Nadlinger
- Re: std.logger Jonathan M Davis
- Re: std.logger Craig Dillabaugh
- Re: std.logger SomeDude
- Re: std.logger Jonathan M Davis
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: std.logger ilya-stromberg